Clive Hamilton, the executive director of The Australia Institute, has published a wonderful thought piece in The Sydney Morning Herald. In it, Hamilton suggests that:
“While we stigmatise fat people, perhaps they are behaving normally in a sick social environment. The answer then is not diets, drugs and surgery but a wholesale change in the culture of consumption, which itself is a reaction to the emptiness of affluence.
Maybe we need a new organisation, Overconsumers Anonymous, to provide us all with a 12-step plan in which we first must admit we have lost control and then submit ourselves to a higher power. It may turn out to be a less painful way of coping with our addiction to stuff than being swallowed up by consumer debt when the economy turns sour.” Click here for more.
Contrasting this presentation (indeed, any honest presentation for that matter) of Western society with the trials and tribulations of less wealthy nations and the question begs, how equipped are we as a society to face adversity?
Although there is a sentiment among many that humans are exceptionally resilient, are those who have known no hardships beyond over-consumption really able to face catastrophe?
We are prone as a society to accept so-called social sicknesses with compassion, often blinding us from asking what the long-term effects of such conditions will have on the wider social fabric. Our growing inability to look at these human problems objectively is preventing us from asking serious questions about our future safety as a species.
In the immediate future alone, over-consumption threatens the world’s limited fresh water supply and is already destroying ecosystems. This is to say nothing of the impact our current spoiled state will have on our ability to overcome the challenges that will undoubtedly follow as a result of the environmental changes brought on by over-consumption.
It’s an ugly reality, to be sure, but one that needs considering nonetheless.
You must be logged in to post a comment.